Duns Scotus
John Duns Scotus | |
|---|---|
Portrait by Justus van Gent, c. 1476-1478 | |
| Born | c. 1265/66 Duns, Berwickshire, Scotland |
| Died | 8 November 1308 (aged 41–42) Cologne, Holy Roman Empire |
| Venerated in | Catholic Church |
| Beatified | 20 March 1993, Vatican City by Pope John Paul II |
| Major shrine | Franciscan Church, Cologne, Germany |
| Feast | 8 November |
| Attributes | Books, a vision of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the moon on the chest of a Franciscan friar |
| Patronage | Academics, Cologne, Germany, apologies, scholars, student, theologians and philosophers |
| Education | |
| Education | University of Oxford[1][2] University of Paris |
| Doctoral advisor | William of Ware |
| Philosophical work | |
| Era | Medieval philosophy |
| Region | Western philosophy |
| School |
|
| Institutions | University of Oxford |
| Doctoral students | William of Ockham |
| Main interests | Metaphysics, theology, logic, epistemology, ethics |
| Notable ideas |
|
|
Preview warning: Page using Template:Infobox philosopher with unknown parameter "influenced" Preview warning: Page using Template:Infobox philosopher with unknown parameter "influences" | |
John Duns Scotus OFM (/ˈskoʊtəs/ SKOH-təs; Ecclesiastical Latin: [duns ˈskɔtus], "Duns the Scot"; c. 1265/66 – 8 November 1308)[9] was a Scottish Catholic priest and Franciscan friar, university professor, philosopher and theologian. He is considered among the most important philosopher-theologians in Western Christendom during the last part of the medieval period, together with Thomas Aquinas, Bonaventure and William of Ockham.[10]
Duns Scotus has had considerable influence on both Catholic and secular thought. The doctrines for which he is best known are the "univocity of being", that existence is the most abstract concept we have, applicable to everything that exists; the formal distinction, a way of distinguishing between different formalities of the same thing; and the idea of haecceity, the property supposed to be in each individual thing that makes it an individual (i.e. a certain "thisness"). Duns Scotus also developed a complex argument for the existence of God, and argued for the Immaculate Conception of Mary. The intellectual tradition derived from Scotus' work is called Scotism.
Duns Scotus was given the scholastic accolade Doctor Subtilis ("the subtle doctor") for his penetrating and subtle manner of thought. He was beatified by Pope John Paul II in 1993.
- ^ Williams, Thomas (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 2.
- ^ He has long been claimed as a Merton alumnus, but there is no contemporary evidence to support this claim and as a Franciscan, he would have been ineligible for fellowships at Merton (see Martin, G. H. & Highfield, J. R. L. (1997). A History of Merton College. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 53).
- ^ Cross, Richard (2014). Duns Scotus's Theory of Cognition. Oxford University Press. p. 18. ISBN 978-0-19-968488-5.
Scotus is a good Aristotelian, in the sense that he believes that cognition always has an empirical starting point
- ^ Walker, L. (1912). Voluntarism. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 27 September 2019 from New Advent.
- ^ The Sheed & Ward Anthology of Catholic Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield. 2005. ISBN 978-0-7425-3198-7.
- ^ "Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109)", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006, retrieved 10 November 2017
- ^ Anthony Kenny, Wyclif in His Times, Oxford UP, 1986, p. 35 n. 13.
- ^ Harjeet Singh Gill, Signification in language and culture, Indian Institute of Advanced Study, 2002, p. 109.
- ^ Williams, Thomas (2019), "John Duns Scotus", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- ^ Spade, Paul Vincent (2018), "Medieval Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
Histories of medieval philosophy often treat Thomas Aquinas (1224/25–74), John Duns Scotus (c. 1265–1308) and William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347) as the "big three" figures in the last few centuries of the medieval period (1200-1500); a few add Bonaventure (1221–74) as a fourth. Although there is certainly ample justification for giving special emphasis to these authors, it would be misleading if one thought one could get even a fair overall picture from them alone. Nevertheless, the list is instructive and illustrates several things.